“Roughly what should I charge for…”
It will answer. The answer is a blend of whatever was on the internet — national averages, forum posts from 2021, American prices in pounds. It is not your rate, and the confidence is the dangerous part.
For the trades
There’s a version of this that saves you an evening a week, and a version that loses you money on a job you under-priced because a chatbot sounded sure of itself. The difference is whether the numbers came from you. Here’s what AI does well on a quote, where it goes wrong, and how to set it up so it only ever does the first.
AI is good at the words on a quote and poor at the numbers. Given your own rates and the job scope, it will draft a clear, professional quote quickly. Asked to price a job without your figures, it produces a confident number that is wrong for your firm and your site, and it won’t say so. Use your numbers in a tool that calculates reliably, use AI for the writing, and check every line before it goes out — because a quote is what you’ve committed to.
Published
Split the quote into two jobs: the numbers and the words. AI is excellent at the words — clear scope, what’s included, what isn’t, terms, a professional tone, done in a minute. It is unreliable at the numbers, for one simple reason: it doesn’t know yours, and when it doesn’t know something it makes a plausible guess instead of stopping.
So the rule is: your numbers, its words. Give it the rates and the quantities, let it write the document, check every figure before it goes. A quote is a commitment — if the customer accepts it, that’s the price — and a number you didn’t check is a number you’ve agreed to without knowing.
It will answer. The answer is a blend of whatever was on the internet — national averages, forum posts from 2021, American prices in pounds. It is not your rate, and the confidence is the dangerous part.
It doesn’t know what Travis Perkins charged you last Tuesday. Any material figure it produces is stale or invented. Your merchant’s price list goes in; its guess stays out.
Better than it was, still not reliable. Twelve lines of quantities times rates plus VAT and a discount — check the total yourself. It will be right nine times, and the tenth is a £400 hole.
“Re-slate a three-bed semi” does not tell it the roof area, and it will estimate one rather than ask. Measurements come from the site visit, every time.
The common thread: a general AI model is built to produce a complete, plausible answer. On a quote you want the opposite — a tool that stops and says “I don’t have that figure”. That’s why the numbers belong somewhere else.
Don’t take my word for it. Open whichever AI tool you use and try this:
Pick a job you quoted last month, where you know the real figure.
Describe it the way a customer would — “re-slate the front of a 1930s semi in Truro” — and ask for a price.
Compare it to your real quote. Then ask the same question again in a new chat, and see if you get the same number.
You won’t. You’ll get two different confident figures, both some distance from yours. That is the tool working exactly as designed, and it’s all you need to know about letting it price anything.
Keep a rates sheet. Labour per day by role, your standard material prices from the merchant, your markup, your standard extras. One page, updated when prices move.
Measure on site, write the quantities down. They never come from the AI.
Do the sums somewhere that can’t improvise — a spreadsheet or a calculator built for your firm. Rates times quantities, your markup, VAT. Fixed, repeatable, boring.
Give AI the scope, the totals and your terms, and ask for the document. No customer name or address — those go in afterwards, by hand.
Read it like the customer will. Every figure against your sheet, every exclusion, the start date. Then send.
If you quote the same shape of job again and again, the spreadsheet step is worth replacing with something built for the purpose: a calculator on your phone or your website that asks the six questions that drive the price — bedrooms, square metres, number of circuits, access — applies your rates, and produces the quote. The customer can even run it themselves on your site and arrive with a ballpark already in their head.
The difference from AI is the one that matters: a built calculator does the same sum the same way every time, from figures you set, and it never invents one. It’s the kind of tool I build for Cornish trades, fixed price, and I’ll say honestly when a spreadsheet would do.
This is plain-English guidance for small businesses, not formal legal advice. Where something genuinely needs a solicitor or a data-protection specialist, I'll tell you straight.
Names and addresses, key-safe codes, photos of someone’s kitchen. What a trade can safely paste into an AI tool, what it can’t, and the ten-minute fix.
Written by someone who spent forty years on the tools. What genuinely helps a working trade, and what is sales patter.
Every automated test can pass and the app still be wide open. What actually goes wrong, and what to check before you ship.
A quoting calculator built around your own rates — fixed price, quoted before any work starts, and it never invents a figure. Tell me what you quote most and I’ll tell you straight whether it’s worth building.
Ask about a quoting tool